Pirate Bay File-Sharing Leaders Get Jail, Fines
Page 1 of 1
|(L to R) Pirate Bay co-founders Fredrik Neij, Gottfrid Svartholm and Peter Sunde at court last month.|
Analysts said the guilty verdict in the closely watched test case could help music and film companies recoup millions of dollars in lost revenues but they doubted it would stem the tide of illegal downloading.
International trade body IFPI reported earlier this year that about 95 percent of music downloaded in 2008 was illegal.
On its Web site, The Pirate Bay scorned the ruling, calling it a "crazy verdict."
"As in all good movies, the heroes lose in the beginning but have an epic victory in the end anyhow. That's the only thing Hollywood has ever taught us."
IFPI Svenska Gruppen, an organization representing the Swedish recording industry, said the verdict was "not only positive for the music and film business, but also for all those producers and entrepreneurs trying to create working and legal online services based on real respect for copyright."
The men linked to The Pirate Bay -- Peter Sunde, Gottfrid Svartholm Warg, Fredrik Neij and Carl Lundstrom -- were charged early last year by a Swedish prosecutor with conspiracy to break copyright law and related offenses. They denied the charges.
Companies including Warner Bros., MGM, Columbia Pictures, 20th Century Fox Films, Sony BMG, Universal and EMI also sought damages of more than 100 million crowns ($12 million) to cover lost revenues.
The Stockholm district court said in a statement the four were found guilty of breaching copyright laws and each sentenced to a year in prison.
Lundstrom's attorney Per Samuelson told journalists he was shocked by the verdict and the severity of the sentence.
"That's outrageous, in my point of view. Of course we will appeal," he said. "This is the first word, not the last. The last word will be ours."
The group that controls The Pirate Bay, launched in 2003, says that no copyrighted material is stored on its servers and no exchange of files actually takes place there so it cannot be held responsible for what material is being exchanged.
The prosecution said that by financing, programing and administering the site, the four men promoted the infringement of property rights by the site's users.
Industry experts were not convinced the verdict would have a lasting effect.
"Every time you get rid of one, another bigger one pops up. Napster went, and then up came a whole host of others ... The problem of file-sharing just keeps growing year on year, and it's increasingly difficult for the industry to do anything about it," said music analyst Mark Mulligan of research firm Forrester.
Dan Cryan, senior analyst at media research firm Screen Digest, said the lack of international copyright law meant Web sites dedicated to illegal downloads could simply move on to a new country if legislation tightened where they operated.
"Pirate Bay was brilliant at self-publicity, but the reality is there are lots of other torrent-tracker sites," he said.
"The closing of the one that shouts the loudest won't make any difference."