Suit Claims $17B in Damages from Bertelsmann
Page 1 of 1
Napster may be dead and gone but the billion dollar litigation that marred its existence has shown no signs of letting up.
German media conglomerate, Bertelsmann AG, a one-time backer was slapped with a $17 billion lawsuit in New York late Wednesday alleging its financial support to Napster contributed to copyright infringement by users of the rogue file-sharing application.
Bertelsmann, itself a former foe of Napster, pumped more than $90 million into the peer-to-peer firm with ambitious plans to create a legitimate, membership-based music download service but that partnership is now at the center of the latest legal wrangle.
The suit was filed by a group of songwriters and two independent music publishers -- Frank Music and Peer International -- that have long been part of the anti-Napster brigade. According to allegations in the lawsuit, evidence in Napster's bankruptcy proceedings show Bertelsmann knew the company was breaking the law but decided to keep the service running while it worked on a legitimate version.
"Bertelsmann did not condition its funding on Napster's stopping its infringement of plaintiffs' rights. [Instead, it] made a deliberate and calculated business decision to continue the infringing service in order to preserve Napster's valuable user bases," the lawsuit alleges.
The music publishers allege that bankruptcy filings show that the bulk of Bertelsmann's funding for Napster, which was supposed to go towards creating a legitimate file-swapping service, instead when into paying to keep the illegal Napster in operation.During that time, the suit alleges Bertelsmann knowingly colluded with Napster to infringe on copyrighted works. The group is seeking a penalty of $150,000 covering more than 110,000 infringed works, the maximum statutory penalty.
Even though lawyers routinely ask for inflated penalties, industry watchers say the $17 billion claim is heavily inflated in today's retail music market. On average, 110,000 songs round out to less than 10,000 CDs and, calculating at $14 per CD, 110,000 songs work out to a retail value of $140,000.
However, there is no way to quantify the actual losses suffered by copyright holders during Napster's peak when approximately 10,000 copyright-protected digital files were copied every second. Napster boasted a userbase of tens of millions in late 2000.
The lawsuit is also seeking class-action status for about 150,000 songwriters and music publishers.
Lawyers on both sides could not be reached for comment at press time but one analyst described the suit as "unsurprising."
"In the music business, lawsuits are a business model. It doesn't surprise me that Napster's name is still associated with lawsuits. We saw the same thing with MP3.com and the numerous lawsuits that followed them," said Lee Black, a digital music analyst with Jupiter Research.
Black said it was unfortunate that Bertelsmann was being sued for its Napster partnership even after its public efforts and big spending to redirect the file-sharing service towards legitimacy. "It was not until after Bertelsmann invested that Napster changed direction and decided to pursue deals with the labels," he added.