Domain Group Cries Foul Over Latest ICANN Proposal
Page 1 of 1
Critics of The Internet Corporation of Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) came out swinging this week, in reaction to the group's Nov. 6 proposal to The Commerce Department outlining plans to transfer the Domain Name System from government to private-sector control.
On Tuesday, a consortium of international country-code top level domain administrators (ccTLDs) banded together to protest ICANN's proposal. The consortium formed The International Association of Top Level Domains (IATLD), a group of 12 nations, including Lao People's Democratic Republic, Mexico and Mauritius. The organization also claims to have the support of 66 countries around the world.
IATLD said it fears statements made by ICANN recently indicate significant policy changes that "could threaten the smooth functioning of ccTLDs and the Internet."
Specifically, IATLD points to RFC 1591, the Internet domain name policies authored for the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority by the late Jon Postel in 1994. RFC 1591 governs the assignment and management of Top Level Domain name registries.
The administrators want ICANN to agree to use RFC 1591 as the basis of any action taken on the country-code domains.
According to IATLD President Antony Van Couvering, ICANN released a statement, also on Nov. 6, that said, "ICANN will respect each nation's sovereign control over its individual top level domain."
He said that represents a marked change in Internet policy.
"This would be a major departure from the current administration of top-level domains," Van Couvering said. "Until now, the domain system, like the Internet, has functioned as an international private network, using RFC 1591 as its framework. While governments should and do have an interest in the administration of top-level domains, they are not the only source of authority, nor should they be. At worst, this could nationalize and segment the Internet, breaking it up into parcels of cyber-territories."
"The whole stated purpose of the formation of ICANN was to get government out of the direct administration of the Internet. We don't understand this move at all," Van Couvering said.
VanCouvering said RFC 1591 provides an objective code of conduct all nations should use. He said the flexibility and stability of the Internet could be seriously compromised if every country oversaw its top-level domain. He also criticized ICANN's board for supporting that proposal.
Calls made to Dyson were not returned and Roberts is traveling, according to his office.
Stafford Guest, administrative manager for the .NU domain of the tiny island nation of Niue, cautioned against any radical change.
"Today there are over 220 ccTLDs worldwide up and running under the requirements of RFC 1591, many with decades of experience. A radical change, such as implementing arbitrary national authority over private businesses and organizations, could put the whole Internet in jeopardy. You'd have to be concerned about the Internet's stability, continuity and basically the ability to maintain the current Internet system and policies."
IATLD's members include Van Couvering, who is former president of NetNames USA, Brian Cartmell, Cocos & Keeling Island (.CC); Juan Edgar Nunez, Dominican Republic (DO); Niggel Roberts, Guernsey (.GG) and others.
ICANN will hold a public meeting Saturday in Cambridge, Mass. for comments on the domain plan.