MicroStrategy: Macro Problems
Page 1 of 1
Want to terrify investors? Mention the word "restatement." It does sound like a harmless word. In fact, that's the purpose -- to make things sound OK. But, of course, things are instead very bad.
Restatement is a word to describe when public filings have been, well, wrong. Usually, they are overstated. Restatement is typically the result of overzealous corporations who try to please Wall Street at any cost.
Yesterday, we saw a blatant example of the nightmare of restatement. MicroStrategy (MSTR) , which has been a darling of Wall Street, announced that it must revise revenues for the past two years. What's more, the profits reported in 1999 were actually losses.
Wall Street reacted with incredible ferocity. The stock went into free-fall, plunging 140 points to 86-3/4 (the stock has been as high as $333). That eliminated about $11 billion in market cap.
The change for MicroStrategy means that it is not a superfast company. The 1999 revenues will be $150-$155 million instead of $205.3 million. There would also be a loss of 43-51 cents per share versus a 15 cent gain.
No doubt, the company is real; it is not a sham. The company develops useful software for e-commerce companies. And, the company will continue to grow. Unfortunately, MicroStrategy is tainted. Many investors feel cheated, as well as burned.
Historically, companies that have major restatements have lengthy recoveries -- if they ever recover. Recent horror stories include Cendant and Oxford Health, both of which are still reeling from their restatements. So, while it may seem tempting to buy MicroStrategy because of the seemingly low valuation, it would not be surprising to see the stock fall even further. When under the eye of the SEC, accountants get very conservative and so does the company's growth rate.
------------ Alex Kanabe wrote: "I think we should wait on MicroStrategy. The market is too volatile and it shows no signs of stabilizing. There could me more downside here." Discuss it here