A Better Fate for Sun
Page 1 of 1
There are still a whole lot of questions to be answered, of course, but all things considered, this is a far better end for Sun than it was facing with IBM. The general consensus on IBM buying Sun was that the hardware business would be decimated and Sparc was toast. Now it has a chance to live on.
It's funny how despite all the copy I've seen written about this merger, it was the Farkers who pointed out the obvious: Oracle now gets to be IBM. (That's why I love you guys. The jokes written in SQL code were a nice touch, too.)
Now Larry Ellison has exactly that. He will have some impressive hardware that has been given the short shrift lately, hardware that bares a very strong resemblance to what Cisco is trying to do. As it is, the majority of Sun servers are likely running Oracle software now, notes Charles King of Pund-IT research.
But Oracle has some work to do. It needs to assure partners that it won't play favorites to Sun hardware. It needs to calm the Java and especially MySQL communities, assuming it actually wants to. Oracle's past acquisitions show a pattern of buying customer bases, not technologies. Right, BEA customers?
Overall, this seems a better fit for Sun. The final price is almost exactly that of IBM's price, so why is Sun taking this and not IBM's lucre?