eMailbag Monday: Readers Ask About Yahoo, Aussie ISP, & Others
Page 1 of 1
First reader up this week writes:
"Steve, where can I find an ISDEX Fund?"
Reply: You can't. ISDEX is an index, although we'd like to see a big mutual fund company consider it. Fidelity? The interesting thing was that in 1997 on an average basis ISDEX gained 49%, despite some well-known losers.
"Hi, I love Yahoo, but how can Yahoo's stock price be so high? If it increased its revenue by 1000% AND improved its profit margin from--40% to 10%--its P/E would still be a mere 53! Are investors insane? Somebody shhtop meh!" [Jim Carrey, The Mask]?"
Reply: After watching Yahoo (NASDAQ:YHOO) in living color, we wonder how much elasticity is in the stock price, and so far about as much as Jim Carrey's facial expressions.
Calling Down Under Value
"I have been looking at an Internet phone company called OzEmail (ticker OZEMY) trading at only 7 x's earnings. The company has some interesting long-term partners (e.g., Mitsubishi). Any thoughts?
Reply: OzEmail (NASDAQ:OZEMY) trades on NASDAQ as American Depository Receipts or ADRs, one share = 10 ADRs. It's Australia's largest ISP and just acquired a few smaller ones. IP telephony is one aspect of its services. Australians are warming to the Web and we figure could be a bigger presence in many realms soon, from e-commerce to content.
What's Hot In 1998?
"How about Westell Technologies (WSTL)--king of the ADSL technology. It's getting contracts from GTE, Bell Atlantic, etc.; 50 or more are beta testing the equipment and technology with the major companies showing a dedication to the technology along with Microsoft & Intel. After the Asian market crisis, the stock is almost trading at its all-time low! How's that one for a 1998 pick?"
Reply: We think DSL could be the telco world's best hope of fending off the cable industry's foray into high-speed services. Telcos have a jump in many ways since their networks are already switchable (two-way). If DSL proves reliable and the telcos can roll it out--two big concerns here--then Westell could get more attention on Wall Street.
Westell, a leader in DSL, made a failed bid for Internet communications firm Amati last September, yet Texas Instruments outbid it. In the "why can't we still be friends department," in what looks like a good move, Westell and TI agreed to cooperate on DSL. So Westell gets the benefit of Amati without the dilution of a merger. It also has agreements with most of the telco world for DSL. We'll be watching Westell.
"Steve-Regarding your column on Earthlink, may it be the Queen of customer
service, but MindSpring is the King. Long live the King!
President & COO MindSpring
Reply: In the interest of fairness we'll let you guys battle it out in the marketplace for rights to "king" or "queen." From our perspective both firms are on to something with the goal of pleasing the customer. Funny how that simple notion gets lost so many times in the technology sector.
Automated customer support, endless voice menu systems, confusing documentation, Cyrillic technical documentation, these seem to be the status quo for many companies in the PC and Internet industries. People want people, not Yamigotchi or whatever that PC virtual animal is that seems to exist at the customer service desks of many firms.
Dear Bill's Outlook Express
Dear Steve, contrary to popular belief, Microsoft does not own the Internet. Nor does it own personal computing and the future of the country.
The DOJ is right in its attempt to curtail the misjudgments of the infallible upper-level management at Microsoft. Bill being the architect of this group should realize that if they push it much further it could disrupt the opinions of those much more powerful than they!
This being the opinion of the American people. No one likes a bully. The Internet is only getting bigger. Regulation has arrived. If the upper tier of Microsoft persists it will indeed fall short to the powers that be. Bill will rule his empire but it will not include the Internet.
Reply: We couldn't help but notice the irony in the fact that you used Microsoft's Outlook Express to send us that message....