This is the Silicon Alley equivalent of the Silicon Valley two-guys-in-a-garage company myth: Two guys and a Mac in a post industrial loft start building Websites and New York's old line media companies -- publishers, ad agencies and the like -- beat a path to their door. Out of this primordial ooze of Silicon Alley, in the dark days of 1994 and 1995 rose budding companies like Razorfish, Agency.Com, Mercury Seven, MethodFive, i33, Interactive8, Avalanche and i/o360. So far, so good for many of these first-generation Silicon Alley service firms. Often with the backing of traditional ad agency companies, these start-ups have grown enormously in a short period of time, or been rolled into larger companies. The recently public Razorfish -- with the backing of giant ad agency holding company Omnicom, for example -- has grown to a than 400 employees, pro forma revenues of better than $30 million a year, and a market capitalization of $940 million. Better still, the company turned an operating profit last quarter! But if times are so good for the interactive agencies, why is everybody trying to get out of the business or find a new business model for Web services and solutions shops? Because the value of the interactive agency model is eroding faster than Malibu beachfront property. The challenges are enormous: First of all, interactive agencies by and large make their money in one-time fees for project work. That means it's hard to sustain revenue growth -- you're always on the hustle for new work. And you're always at the mercy of your biggest clients -- lose one of them and your bottom line tanks. Nonetheless, this model has sustained a little business known as "advertising" here in New York for many generations. Second, few of the agency companies have the technical expertise the clients are now demanding. Many of the interactive agencies in New York were begun by designers -- people with graphics, not technology, on their minds. That was fine when clients were mostly interested in brochure-ware, but as use of the Web by consumers and business has exploded, so have the desires of clients to have fully functioning applications that bring the entirety of their businesses online. These are projects that often involve integrating Web systems with enormous legacy back-end information processing systems at financial service companies, retailers, and the like. So far, agencies typically have dealt with the challenge by selling design front ends to clients and outsourcing technology work on a project-by-project basis. Others have tried to develop a technology base in house. But in the current market, both strategies that are fraught with varying degrees of peril. Third, once interactive agencies were the only game in town, so it was fairly easy for new business reps to get in front of the brand managers or media buyers at major companies. Now, when interactive agencies go to pitch accounts they find that half the time they are pitching not to the marketing department but the technology department. And their competition for the new business pitches runs the gamut from other interactive agencies to traditional ad agencies, and, increasingly, systems integrators and big consulting firms like IBM, EDS, KPMG Peat Marwick, and PriceWaterhouse Coopers -- companies that can spend more, get in front of more potential clients, and tap a wider range of vendors when they need to provide technology solutions. And these old-line competitors have grown much smarter about the Internet.
So everyone in the interactive agency business is hunting for solutions to the problems of technology, new business development, and sustaining revenue growth. As a result, suddenly there are a half a dozen strategies in play for the reinvention of the interactive agency business. And the success or failure of these new strategies and business models will be crucial for New York as Silicon Alley's first core business sector -- interactive agencies -- matures. Here are some of the trends to watch. 1. Consulting firms and systems integrators will begin buying into interactive services start-ups. The chief battle for a service company is to own the client relationship. The rationale is that he who owns the client relationship owns the work for years to come; everyone else will have to aspire to be an outsource vendor. One of the best ways for a small start-ups to get a foot in the door at a Fortune 500 company is to have an Ernst & Young or an Arthur Andersen or an IBM or EDS carry their water. They call it channel sales, and it is going to begin happening in a big way as Internet service firms begin pairing off with consultants in strategic alliances and eventually, financial ones. Most of those consulting companies won't buy Internet start-ups at the current valuations. But they will very shortly begin putting equity investment money into these companies. And if the stock market falls, look for the big systems integrators and consulting firms to start gobbling up interactive agency start-ups. 2. Interactive services start-ups will function more an more like service bureaus. Sustaining recurring revenues isn't easy for a project driven company. Consider the case of K2 Design, one of the first of the publicly traded Silicon Alley Webshops and a company that began life as a traditional graphics design shop. Last fall, K2 lost its biggest client, WavePhore, which had accounted for more than 23 percent of the company's revenue in 1998. The loss had an immediate impact on the company's bottom line. K2's answer was, in part to "cultivate existing relationships with clients" often in the form of handling the client's ad banner buying on the Internet -- a traditional agency model -- and expand its consultancy business. Other shops have tried to be more creative. For example MethodFive has recently started a site maintenance practice that charges clients hourly fees to maintain and update Websites. Many of those Websites were built by MethodFive competitors, but are being serviced in-house by clients who no longer want the hassle. Look for companies to invent more services they can sell on a non-project basis. 3. Interactive service start-ups will start looking like venture capitalists and holding companies. In the past, Web service firms have traded work for financial participation -- building an e-commerce system of a mortgage broker, for example, and being paid in a mix of cash and a piece of the financial action. But the model of trading Web solutions work for financial participation took a major jump last this month when Rare Medium received an investment of $85 million from LBO guru Leon Black's Apollo Capital Management for the purposes of turning Rare Medium into an incubator and holding company that would acquire equity stakes in companies for a mix of cash and services. Look for other firms to follow suit. 4. Attempts by interactive service shops to develop proprietary software will tank, and service firms will have to focus, more than ever, on service. The cost and quality advantages of building with off-the-shelf software has just become too competitive. Interactive service shops who have long dreamed of building a proprietary workflow system and exploiting it across multiple clients, perhaps even generating licensing fees, will quickly discover that they're too late into a well established market. Increasingly it will be obvious that the service firms' best chance to add value is to build systems using off-the-shelf software and add services like e-commerce fulfillment to client companies. Does all of this mean that Web shops will disappear? Hardly. Because the need for talent and execution is still there. Indeed, some companies have a chance to reach the next level and compete with the big consulting companies. But for most of the others, the choice will be simple: either sell out or be content to live life downstream of the big boys. * Jason Chervokas (jason@atnewyork.com) is Co-Managing Editor and a founder of @NY.LATEST NEWS
UCSD Plans First Flash-Based Supercomputer
Digging Into N.Y.'s Antitrust Suit Against Intel
Analyst: Sony-Ericsson's Android Bid Is Late
Coupon Site Targets Black Friday, Cyber Monday
Microsoft Sites Up Big in Time Spent Online







Digg
Del.icio.us
Facebook
Google
StumbleUpon
Technorati
More stories by this author
