Access FREE Actuate BIRT Developer Tools:

Download: Visual Report Development Tool Download: Spreadsheet Report Writer Webinar: Point-and-click, Visual Report Development Webinar: Automate Secure Report Delivery Demo: Web-based Report Creation for End Users Demo: Automate the Creation of Spreadsheet Reports

Partner With Us Imprinted Gifts Web Hosting Directory Online Shopping Web Design Promos and Premiums Dental Insurance Calling Cards Phone Cards Cell Phones Prepaid Phone Card Disney World Tickets Logo Design Find Software Baby Photo Contest

In a ruling with major implications for domain registrants, a federal court in Virginia has ruled that domain names are property and are subject to different legal protection than previously thought.

The ruling stems from a trademark infringement suit filed against a Canadian corporation, 3263851 Canada, Inc., by Umbro International, a manufacturer of soccer equipment. In the suit, Umbro claimed the defendant infringed upon its trademark when it registered umbro.com in 1997. When the defendant failed to show up in court, the judge issued a default judgment, turning over umbro.com to the company and awarding it $25,000 in attorney's fees.

In subsequent litigation, Alston & Bird, the firm representing Umbro International, instituted a garnishment proceeding against Network Solutions Inc. to force the judicial sale of the domain names.

"The registrant had no tangible US assets that we could levy on, but they did have a number of other domains that they had registered through NSI, so we asked the court to garnish those so we could seize them and sell them to the highest bidder," said Alston & Bird attorney Chris Roblyer.

Roblyer said the Virginia court agreed and on Feb. 3rd granted Alston & Bird rights to 27 domains owned by the defendant.

The law firm said the ruling gives trademark lawyers a new sword to combat domain name piracy. But Bret Fausett, a trademark attorney with Fausett, Gaeta & Lund, said it's actually good news for domain name owners.

"Typically we thought registrants had a two-year license to a domain name, but the court is suggesting they have a property interest. As a result, if the registry takes a name away from you without a legal basis, than you can sue them for civil damages. And that's a powerful thing," Fausett said.

Network Solutions officials were not available for comment, but the company has filed an appeal of the court's decision. According to Fausett, NSI has good reason to be concerned about the ruling, especially because of its impact on NSI's domain dispute resolution policy.

"When NSI licenses something, they have all sorts of rights. But if there are property interests here, that little click-wrap agreement may not be as effective."