Everything Has Changed

See how Intel developed the cure for deskside help visits in this video directed by Christopher Guest of Spinal Tap fame. Click here.
 
Cross-client Centrino® and  Core™2 processor with vPro™ Processor Technology Technical White Paper
A deeper technical dive on how vPro usage models work on both desktop and notebook PCs. Click here.
 
Intel® vPro Technology ROI Estimator
Intel® Core2™ Duo and Centrino® with vPro™ Processor technology cross-client ROI estimator. Click here.
 
WiPro Intel® Centrino® Pro with vPro™ Processor Technology
The Benefits of Intel® Centrino® Pro Processor Technology in the Enterprise. Click here.
 
Workstations Products Platforms Brief
Intel’s family of workstation platforms gives you the tools to move from serial to parallel workflows and enables you to iterate through alternatives faster and innovate more. Click here.
 
Itanium Solutions
Learn how Itanium®-based solutions are changing the way enterprises do business. Click here.


Select a newsletter and click Join to sign up!
Internet Daily
InternetNews

Business Report

Boston News
DC News
NY News
SiliconValley News




Demo: Web-based Report Creation for End Users. BusinessReport Studio will show you how end users can create reports with charts, graphs, conditional formatting and more.





California Regulators Deal Pacific Bell Loss

The California Public Utilities Commission this week ruled Pacific Bell must continue paying competitors who handle its local customers' calls to Internet service providers.

June 25, 1999
By Cyrus Afzali: More stories by this author:

The California Public Utilities Commission this week ruled Pacific Bell must continue paying competitors who handle its local customers' calls to Internet service providers.

By a 3-to-2 vote late Thursday, the commission stayed the fees between Pacific Bell and Pac-West Telecom. The board said it may consider the issue again in the future, however.

California's decision comes after the Federal Communications Commission ruled in February that calls to Internet providers are interstate in nature. However, it said states have the right to decide reciprocal compensation disputes while it conducts an in-depth investigation.

California is just the latest state to deal with the issue. In most cases, regional phone companies have been dealt losses. Regulators have generally ruled they are bound to handle the calls until interconnection agreements expire.

Massachusetts has been the notable exception so far. That state ruled that Bell Atlantic would be exempt from the fees.

Pac Bell has refused to pay more than $50 million in fees to Pac-West over the last two years while the case was being heard. Those funds have been held in a special account. Pacific Bell and Pac-West signed an interconnection agreement in 1996 that Pac Bell sought to amend in 1998. However, the two were unable to agree on many issues and the case went to arbitration.

The companies disputed several of the arbitrator's rulings, including what constitutes a local call and whether local traffic that Pac-West delivers to its ISP customers is covered by the interconnection agreement. The two must submit a new, signed interconnection deal to the commission within the next five days.

Internet service providers have been closely watching the compensation cases. If calls handled by a regional telephone company's competitors are deemed interstate calls, the smaller phone companies could increase rates ISPs pay for phone service to make up for the lost revenue.

The regional telephone companies have protested that they are unfairly required to pay money to rivals to complete calls for their customers while they rarely handle calls made by competitors' customers.






xSP Archives | 7 Day InternetNews Summary | Contact Cyrus Afzali | Back to top