Everything Has Changed
See how Intel developed the cure for deskside help visits in this video directed by Christopher Guest of Spinal Tap fame. Click here.
 
Cross-client Centrino® and  Core™2 processor with vPro™ Processor Technology Technical White Paper
A deeper technical dive on how vPro usage models work on both desktop and notebook PCs. Click here.
 
Intel® vPro Technology ROI Estimator
Intel® Core2™ Duo and Centrino® with vPro™ Processor technology cross-client ROI estimator. Click here.
 
WiPro Intel® Centrino® Pro with vPro™ Processor Technology
The Benefits of Intel® Centrino® Pro Processor Technology in the Enterprise. Click here.
 
Workstations Products Platforms Brief
Intel’s family of workstation platforms gives you the tools to move from serial to parallel workflows and enables you to iterate through alternatives faster and innovate more. Click here.
 
Itanium Solutions
Learn how Itanium®-based solutions are changing the way enterprises do business. Click here.


Select a newsletter and click Join to sign up!
Internet Daily
InternetNews

Business Report

Boston News
DC News
NY News
SiliconValley News




Smart SOA Whitepaper: Best Practices for Agile Innovation & Optimization. Learn IBM's approach to SOA, garnered from best practices & lessons learned from experiences with clients to help extend the value of SOA.





Google Versus Froogles Redux

The search engine takes its Goliath v. David trademark dispute to a new venue.

April 18, 2005
By Susan Kuchinskas: More stories by this author:

Having been rebuffed by an ICANN panel, search giant Google brought its battle against Froogles.com to U.S. court.

Google filed a trademark infringement suit against Richard Wolfe, operator of the relatively tiny Froogles.com, on Monday. The search provider complained that consumers could confuse Wolfe's bargain-shopping site with Google's Froogle and even the name Google itself -- even though Wolfe had been using the name Froogles since December 2000. Wolfe applied for trademark protection for the name in September 2003.

Google launched Froogle in December 2002; it filed for trademark protection of the term in November 2002. The trademark application was approved in February 2004 and published to give others a chance to protest.

Both Wolfe and Stelor Productions, operator of kid-oriented Web site Googles.com, opposed granting the trademark. The Trademark Appeals Board is still considering whether to revoke the trademark, but Google has asked it to suspend the opposition proceeding pending the result of a court trial. Google executives had not responded to a request for comment by press time.

RELATED ARTICLES

Gmail Trademark in Dispute
Of Boobles, Froogles and Googles

For more stories on this topic:

"I believe the trademark board is likely to grant the opposition and refuse to register the mark Froogle to Google," said Wolfe's attorney, Stephen Humphrey, a partner in the law firm Cameron & Hornbostel. He speculated that Google might have filed the civil suit in Wolfe's home state of New York to stave off a loss in front of the Appeals Board.

"It's not whether Froogles infringes Froogle," Humphries said. "My client wins that, because he used Froogles for his shopping service long before Google did."

In its complaint to the U.S. District Court, Eastern District of New York, Google refined its claims. First, it now says that Froogles.com also engages in "search engine services," because it offers the ability to search within the site. Second, Google claims that it owns any word ending in "-oogles."

"Google is the senior user of marks that incorporate the formative -OOGLE for Internet search services," the suit claims.

"Google has expanded its claim, and developed a fairly novel claim that not only does Froogles infringe the trademark Google, but that Google itself owns -oogle," Humphrey said, noting that there are quite a few registered trademarks that end in either the letters oogle or the phonetic version.

Humphrey said that after Wolfe filed an opposition proceeding with the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office last spring, Google told Wolfe that if he would dismiss his opposition, it would leave him alone. If he refused, according to Humphrey, Google's attorneys said, "We'll file a complaint and take the trademark away from you."

The complaint filed today said that Wolfe should have been well aware of the Google name by the time he launched Froogles.com, thanks to the dozens of positive press reports detailed in the complaint.

If today's lawsuit is a retaliatory move for Wolfe's opposition at the USPTO, it may not be the first.

In May 2004, Google filed a complaint with the National Arbitration Forum (NAF) under the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy adopted by ICANN. On July 18, 2004, a three-person NAF panel turned Google down, saying that Froogles was different enough from Google not to confuse the public. The NAF also noted that Google had waited four years from the date the Froogles.com domain name was registered, complaining only after Wolfe filed an opposition to Google's Froogle trademark.

Google still faces competition for the Gmail trademark, the application for which was filed April 2, 2004. Cencourse, a Miami company that provides multimedia services, still has a live application filed March 31, 2004, while Precision Research, a Santa Barbara, Calif., company that consults on the design of high-tech equipment, has a live application also dated April 2. But two other companies that had applied to trademark the term before Google have dropped out of the race.





xSP Archives | 7 Day InternetNews Summary | Contact Susan Kuchinskas | Back to top

Add internetnews.com
to your browser search box.

IE 7 | Firefox 2.0 | Firefox 1.5.x
Receive news
via our XML/RSS:
feed