ISPs Band Together Against Spam

UPDATED: In a coordinated attack against spammers, some of the country’s largest ISPs
have filed new lawsuits against businesses and individuals that allegedly
deluged users with unwanted and offensive e-mails.

The actions were brought by America Online, EarthLink ,
Microsoft and Yahoo under the
federal Can-Spam law.

It’s the second round of lawsuits filed by the group, which founded an
anti-spam alliance in April 2003 to address a common problem that clogs up
their networks and irritates their subscribers.

Each ISP targeted different defendants. In Yahoo’s case, it sued East Coast
Exotics Entertainment Group Inc. and Epoth LLC for delivering sexually
explicit bulk spam e-mail messages to Yahoo Mail users.

“We are holding spammers directly accountable for unlawfully disguising
their identity and using this practice to deceive e- mail users,” Mike
Callahan, Yahoo’s senior vice president and general counsel, said in a
statement.

Meanwhile, Yahoo’s alliance partners were filing their own lawsuits in
courthouses around the country. America Online sued two “John Doe”
defendants, one that targets a sender of SPIM, or unwanted instant messages.
It’s believed to be the first suit ever brought for misusing the IM system.

The second AOL complaint goes after an alleged spammer peddling prescription
pharmaceuticals such as Vicodin online.

EarthLink filed several lawsuits against “Joe Doe” defendants trying to sell
drugs and mortgages. And Microsoft’s lawyers drafted three suits against
defendants who allegedly spoofed the domains of all four ISPs to market a
number of products in violation of the Can-Spam law which took effect Jan.
1.

Filing the John Doe suits gives the ISPs the right to start discovery and issue subpoenas to find their actual identities, according to Les Seagraves, assistant general counsel and chief privacy officer for EarthLink.

“We’re just a couple subpoenas away to delivering the lawsuit to a real defendant somewhere,” he said. Earthlink will subpoena domain registrars, Web hosting services and companies that enabled sending of the spam.

While the CAN-SPAM Act was widely criticized for not being strong enough, Seagraves said it’s a help to ISPs. “CAN-SPAM gives us great tools to go after the worst parts of spam, forging headers and using deceptive practices,” he said. The Anti-Spam Alliance’s quick action under the new law has dispelled some of those criticisms, he asserted.

This is the second wave of lawsuits filed by Alliance members. The first round began in early March. Seagraves said the ISPs still are working through the discovery process in those suits.

In addition to lawsuits, the ISP rivals have collaborated on the technical
side to slow the flow of spam. In June, the companies presented a host of
best practices and technical recommendations to the entire ISP industry.

The suggestions focused on two areas: helping solve the e-mail forgery
problems by using cryptographic-based and IP-based methods to eliminate
e-mail spoofing; and best practices to prevent ISPs and customer from
unwittingly becoming sources of spam.

In addition, the four major ISPs continue their own individual efforts to
protect members. AOL for example said this week that it will give away
anti-virus services to its members. Virus are often carried in spam e-mails
that are disguised as legitimate messages.

In a twist of irony, Earthlink’s public relations agency had great difficulty getting a press release on the current suits through corporate e-mail filters, a spokesperson said. But Seagraves denied that e-mail is becoming an inefficient way to communicate amid a sea of spam.

“It’s definitely not broken,” he said. “We’re going on the offensive — coming up with products, educating consumers and suing spammers — that will make sure it’s not broken.”


Susan Kuchinskas contributed to this story

News Around the Web