Organizations supporting open access to cable networks are still celebrating last week’s U.S. District Court ruling that AT&T Corp. must make open access part of its $55 billion Tele-Communications
Inc.
“This decision was unavoidable and the idea that a
local commission can’t speak for their own utilities is not the exception,
but the harbinger of things to come,” said Greg Simon, co-director of openNET Coalition.
“The federal government should take notice that the local
governments want this to happen. We’re hoping that the Federal Communications Commission reads the
writing on the wall an opens up cable access so local governments don’t
need to fight with all these big company lawyers.”
The FCC has noticed and is expected to put Internet Ventures Inc.’s petition for a
declaratory ruling about cable access on the docket this week.
If the commission’s cable bureau acts Tuesday,
that means that a public notice will be made and initial comments will be reviewed for 30 days. After July 13, any replies to initial
comments would close at the end of the month.
Further speculation has it that FCC Chairman William Kennard may issue a
statement this week reiterating the commission’s hands-off philosophy
toward cable regulation and the need for market driven competition of cable
modem access.
On the heels of the Portland decision, IVI has been quick to file multiple
requests with AT&T for leased access information on systems in five cities
throughout Oregon and Washington.
Don Janke, president of IVI said the Portland decision “certainly is one
more step, one giant leap for some communities” in the Northwest.
“We’re going to get leased access. It’s not a matter of when,
it’s a matter of where.”
However Janke noted that leased access is only the
first step in providing broadband cable access for Internet service
provides.
“Now it’s time to put our equipment in the enemies camp,” he quipped.
Bill Whyman, an analyst with Legg-Mason’s Precursor Group, said from an Internet perspective, the Portland ruling
is very good news.
“Taken together with the IVI FCC filing and the
Portland ruling, things are merging to indicate a regulatory trend. This
trend is particularly good for independent ISPs like MindSpring and EarthLink because it guarantees they
won’t be locked out of providing cable modem access,” Whyman said.
Whyman said the open cable market trends are also critically
important to Internet portals.
“AT&T is now a vertically integrated entity.
Microsoft Corp. and Netscape Communications Corp. browsers
have proven that 80 percent of content chosen while navigating the Net is
selected from within the portals content base. That’s a boom to commerce
partners and a dangerous opportunity to build a closed private intranet
within the Internet for AT&T.”
AT&T is expected to file its own petition with the FCC this week. The
telecommunications giant has labeled the Portland decision as inexplicable.
AT&T was quick to point out that the real losers are likely to be the
citizens of Portland and Multnomah County because the federal court’s
decision can only delay deploying new services to the area.
Janke reassured Portland residents that “they will at least have one choice
when it comes to selecting a cable access provider” and that IVI will help
any local ISP in any way they can to gain access to cable networks.
Even before IVI entered the battle for leased access in Oregon, local ISPs
were active in all procedures advocating open access to cable networks.
Rich Bader, vice-president of ORISTA, an Oregon-based Internet organization
and operator of EasyStreet, a Portland ISP, said they worked with US West and America Online to make their opinions known.
“Regional Bell Operating Centers like US West have built DSL
networks and have made them open and available for ISPs to offer DSL
services. I see no reason why the same opportunities should not apply under
a similar set of rules for cable networks to open their environment,” Bader said.
As to adding cable modem access at EasyStreet, Bader said, “We’re going to
wait and see how this evolves through the courts. Right now this is going
to force the FCC to make a ruling. We believe that competition is a good
thing and that the FCC will rule in favor of consumer choice.”
