Does Transparency Matter in WAN Optimization?

NEW YORK — Is faster necessarily better?

In a boisterous over-capacity and overtime session at Interop here today, vendors debated the merits of WAN and application acceleration and
whether transparency is required for them to actually work
within enterprise environments.

Moderator Erick Siegel, a senior analyst at Burton Group, began the session with
a long explanation of why WAN acceleration is necessary. More and
more enterprises are centralizing applications and services and are
delivering services over the WAN.

“The problem is that the applications work well on the LAN,” Siegel said. “But when moved to a WAN, response time is longer than expected and app
timeouts appear.”

Siegel said there are four key reasons why most WANs are in need of
some form of optimization or acceleration.

The first is transmission
latency. Simply put: You cannot change the laws of physics.

On a LAN, which is by definition local, an app may have 0 milliseconds latency. When you go from New York to San Francisco latency, goes to 30 ms; from New York to London it hits 50 ms.

“The longer the string the longer it takes, ” Siegel said.

Bandwidth restrictions of WAN pipes is also a cause for lag.

“Effective bandwidth depends on the error rate and the ability to fill the
transmission channel,” Siegel noted. “TCP/IP works in bursts of data and then

Ping-pong latency is also an issue, according to Siegel. The “ping pong”
effect is caused by apps that have a lot of back-and-forth activity to perform
their functions.

There are a number of ways that vendors are working on accelerating WAN
traffic. Among them is file caching, which helps improve response
time and decrease bandwidth.

Siegel also identified compression as being a solution, though he noted that
you cannot compress encrypted data.

Overall data reduction is also a key technique being employed by app
acceleration vendors.

“What they do is build a dictionary at both ends of the path and then
substitute pointers for data strings,” Siegel explained.

Vendors are also working at protocol acceleration, which improves flow and
error control and helps to reduce ping-pong behavior.

Despite the apparent benefits of WAN and application acceleration, there are a
number of concerns that enterprises have with the technology.

David Hughes, CTO of Silver Peak, noted that transparency is an issue.

“Whatever the IP addresses are on the client side, they need to appear again
on the server so intrusion protection systems (IPS) don’t get confused by
addresses that change.”

A lack of transparency can also be a cause of WAN routing issues.

“It’s very important that packets get to the appliance on the other side so
they can get decompressed,” Hughes noted.

Liad Ofek, vice president of technical services at Expand Networks, also noted transparency as potential issue for enterprise WANs

“In MPLS , you need to have certain visibility/transparency to
take advantage of advanced services,” Ofek said.

Mark Day, chief scientist at Riverbed Technology, went so far as to state that
the only way to maintain complete transparency is by not optimizing.

The remainder of the panel members didn’t agree.

Dan DeCasper, CTO of Orbital Data, which is now part of Citrix, explained that
his company tries very hard to maintain transparency and, for example, doesn’t
change TCP/IP headers.

According to DeCasper, Citrix has won many deals based on that capability.

Riverbed’s Day argued that enterprises still want the ability to
distinguish between optimized and non-optimized. He said that with full
transparency you can’t measure what’s being optimized.

Again, his panel peers disagreed.

Extend’s Ofek said that his company just handles measurement directly on the
optimization box.

Day took aim at the ease of deployment of other
vendors’ solutions. He said one vendor’s solution takes 148 steps to get the solution up and running while Riverbed’s has only 23 steps.

On that point, a member of the audience disagreed with Day. According to the
audience member, it is non trivial to get any vendors’ WAN acceleration
technologies installed at all.

Despite the potential transparency issues, Siegel still thinks that there is
value in enterprises adopting application acceleration technologies now.

“Think about your situation and what the pain is and then look at the solution
to target that pain,” Siegel said.

News Around the Web