Interop: App Delivery Choices Abound


NEW YORK — Enterprise IT shops are facing a multi-year trend toward having more employees in remote offices while trying to consolidate their datacenters. The
goal is to connect all those disparate users with their applications as fast
as possible. Attendees at the Interop show here hope to learn how to meet that goal.


Some vendors recommend a WAN acceleration approach, and others recommend
including more intelligence and capabilities in the router. A third group
recommends using Application Front End (AFE) appliances.


Jim Metzler, vice president of consulting firm Ashton, Metzler & Associates who
moderated multiple panels, said it’s a balancing act where enterprises want more functionality and less equipment.


One solution that vendors have yet to hype is increasing the bandwidth. Jeff Prince, chairman and CTO of ConSentry Networks, said that the connectivity issue has already been solved.


“It’s not an issue of bandwidth to the desktop anymore; U.S. corporations
don’t need 10 GbE,” Prince said. “It’s about starting to use the network for
services. So while Gig E is cheap, there are better places to spend your
dollars.”


Forrester Research analyst Chris Silva said his firm sees a network
utility model as being the one that makes the most sense. It’s the idea of
having the network reach out to endpoints and giving enough bandwidth to do
role-specific tasks.


“Network spending is being driven on that model whether its voice, CRM or
other apps,” Silva said.


For Cisco the approach is to integrate services and functionality into its
core Integrated Services Router (ISR) platform. The idea is that the ISR can
live in a branch office and process intensive activities that can occur in the
head office, which the branch is connected too.


Michael Wood, director of product management for the access routing technology group at Cisco, referred to his company’s approach as the “empowered branch.” The idea is about unifying voice, data and video, optimizing the WAN and having full security.


“WAN access is still an expensive push off bandwidth-intensive loads to the head
office,” Wood said. “Integration delivers operation efficiency.”


One member of the audience pressed Wood, alleging that in Cisco’s model if
you lose your link to the head office, you lose service. Wood responded that
he sees many businesses using platform mirroring from two different service
providers in order to ensure availability.


“There are options, and as you save money from integration you can invest in
infrastructure,” Wood said.


For WAN acceleration vendor Blue Coat, the key to having application
delivery availability is about acceleration. Chris King, director of
strategic marketing at Blue Coat, noted that users are everywhere and
applications are anywhere. The idea for Blue Coat is to stop the bad
traffic and to accelerate the good.


“If you secure everything, business process can’t flow,” King said. “If you
accelerate everything, you accelerate viruses, too.”


Time and again in session after session, attendees asked vendors about how
many boxes they should actually be using to handle application delivery and
where those boxes should sit.


“How much belongs in the router? It’s a tough question,” Metzler said. “We
can’t have just one box, and then again we don’t want to have 20 of them.
What functionality will migrate over time and what functionally gets done
where?”


At Interop New York 2007, the answer is still an open question.

Get the Free Newsletter!

Subscribe to our newsletter.

Subscribe to Daily Tech Insider for top news, trends & analysis

News Around the Web