DOJ Will Appeal Obscenity Ruling


The U.S. Department of Justice (DoJ) plans to appeal a recent district court
ruling throwing out obscenity charges against a Los Angeles adult video
production company that distributes its materials over the Internet.


In the first major U.S. obscenity trial in 10 years, U.S. District Court
Judge Gary Lancaster of Pittsburgh dismissed on Jan. 20 the 10-count
indictment against Extreme Associates and its owners Robert Zicari and Janet
Romano.


Lancaster ruled individuals have the right to view the material in the
privacy of their homes. The judge also said Extreme Associates has the right
to distribute the material.


“The Department of Justice places a premium on the First Amendment right to
free speech, but certain activities do not fall within those protections,
such as selling or distributing obscene materials,” Attorney General Alberto
R. Gonzales said in a statement. “The Department of Justice remains strongly
committed to the investigation and prosecution of adult obscenity cases.”


According to a DoJ press statement, the reasoning of the district court in
dismissing the indictment, if upheld, “would undermine not only the federal
obscenity laws, but all laws based on shared views of public morality, such
as laws against prostitution, bestiality and bigamy.”


Zicari and Romano were featured on a PBS Frontline investigative show
in 2002 focusing on the pornography business. On that show, Zicari
challenged law enforcement officials to “come after us for obscenity.”


In August of 2003, Zicari and Romano, who often go by their stage names, Rob
Black and Lizzie Borden, were charged with
distributing obscene videos over the Internet and through the mail.


Federal marshals and postal inspectors from Pittsburgh and Philadelphia,
with assistance from the Los Angeles Police Department, served a search and
seizure warrant at Extreme Associates’ San Fernando Valley offices for four
videos, including one entitled “Forced Entry,” which depicts a woman being
beaten, raped and spat upon.


Also seized were sales records, distribution records, invoices, transaction
records, records of payments and deposits, profit/loss and financial
statements, records of accounts payable and accounts receivable, expense
records, customer lists, employee records, notes, correspondence and other
business papers that reflect or relate to the production, advertisement,
distribution, and the sale of the films.


At the time, U.S. Attorney Mary Beth Buchanan said, “If a company is wanting
to take advantage of the Internet for marketing and distribution purposes,
it’s their responsibility to make sure they are not violating local laws.”


The Supreme Court ruled in 1973 that material is obscene if it is patently
offensive, appeals to prurient interest and has no artistic merit.

News Around the Web