Sues eBay, PayPal for Breach of Contract has filed a lawsuit against PayPal and eBay
for it says not living up to the legal obligations it
has under an existing deal to sell postage stamps online. says that eBay interfered with a deal it had with PayPal, and it
went onto say in court papers that PayPal, failed to assist in
launching a new online postage service and is also in violation of an
existing contract with the company.

eBay is the parent company of PayPal and the disagreement between it and over the terms of a postage licensing agreement. says
in addition to breach of contract, the company alleges eBay is in breach of
the implied covenants of good faith and fair dealing.

Back in June 2002, says it inked a license agreement which paved
the way for PayPal to use its technology, so that its customers could buy
and print postage online.

Under the terms of the deal, says the partners were to make the
PayPal online postage service available by the 2002 holiday buying season.
However, PayPal customers must sill use a credit card number to pay for
postage purchases.

“It became evident that eBAY was dragging its feet in implementing’s technology into PayPal’s service. In June 2002, STMP and
PayPal signed a two-year license to enable PayPal users to buy and print
postage online from their PayPal accounts. Subsequently, EBAY acquired
PayPal. STMP delivered the requisite software but has been frustrated by
what it perceives to be delay tactics from eBAY,” says Michael Crawford,
analyst at B. Riley & Co., who currently has a strong buy rating on but has no investment banking relationship with the company. said it believes that PayPal did not live up to its contractual
obligations in the agreement. Specifically, believes PayPal did
not work to launch the functionality in any reasonable time
frame, made misrepresentations to and acted in bad faith. is also alleging that eBay improperly interfered in the and PayPal relationship.’s legal complaint was filed on Tuesday in Superior Court of the
State of California in Los Angeles County. The company said it is seeking to
recover damages both from the “lost value of the agreement as well as
additional damages due to PayPal and eBay bad faith and interference.”

“It’s interesting to note that’s agreement was with PayPal prior
to the eBay acquisition, although after the eBay acquisition was announced. is trying to go after the parent company on a ‘tortious
interference’ theory — that eBay caused PayPal to breach its obligations to,” Jeffrey D. Osterman, partner with Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP,
told Osterman is not representing the company in the case.

“I’m not sure why PayPal didn’t integrate the service into the
PayPal site, but I suppose the underlying message is that commercial relationships
sometimes go sour and depending on the agreement there may be substantial
consequences if you announce a product and then don’t follow through,” added

“Additionally, believes that eBAY has been working behind the
scenes with the USPS to develop some alternative shipping solution,”
Crawford said.

While it will be some time before the court reviews the case,
appears to be muddling along, posting unimpressive financial results. For
the first quarter of 2003, revenues rose 11 percent to a paltry $4.6 million.
The company’s net loss totaled $2.1 million, up from $707,000 previously. most recent financial results reflect continued sales
of its NetStamps labels through the company’s online store, but those sales
were offset by lower margins and increased promotional expenses.

“We believe has a good case and fairly strong chance of
recovering costs. However, we consider this unexpected development as a net
negative to the story overall, as a productive partnership with
eBAY could accelerate growth of its PC postage business, in our opinion,”
Crawford added.

The company’s United States Postal Service-approved Internet postage service
offers customers the ability to print information-based indicia, or
electronic stamps, which can be printed directly onto envelopes or labels.

News Around the Web