From where it stands today, WiMax – real, 802.16-based WiMax – has nowhere to go but up. Parks Associates says 8% of the 1.1 billion broadband subscribers in the world will be using mobile WiMax by 2012. Senza Fili Consulting says that number will be 54 million users, and by that same time, 61% of those will be using it for mobile access.
So why has so much recent news from the WiMax providers in the U.S. been somewhat gloomy? Just as a company like Towerstream caps off an IPO, Sprint Nextel
shows signs of bailing out on WiMax via a sale, or at best, by partnering with others. Still, the WiMax Forum, the industry consortium that tests WiMax products for interoperability, was bullish enough to launch its fifth interoperability testing lab right here in the U.S., via AT4 wireless in Virginia.
Wi-Fi Planet spoke with Monica Paolini, the founder and president of Senza Fili — their latest report, out today, is called “WiMax: Ambitions and Reality — to get her take on how things stand, WiMax-wise. “There’s a lot of [WiMax] adoption in emerging countries… This is due to demand, and having a lot of small operators. In the U.S., the picture is turned upside down,” she says.
In the United States, only one major incumbent operator has made serious plans to install WiMax: Sprint — to the tune of 3 billion dollars. The only serious competition is from companies like Clearwire
and, to a lesser extent, Towerstream
, which are targeting different segments of the market: Clearwire wants residential customers using cable/DSL, and Towerstream wants to do wireless T1 replacements for businesses. (And neither is even using real WiMax technology yet, but that’s almost beside the point these days.)
“In the last week, we’ve seen some sobering realizations,” says Paolini, referring to the news from the Wall Street Journal that Sprint may be ready to re-think its WiMax plans after investors balked at the costs. Even after all that it has spent so far, Sprint will only have 19 WiMax markets launched by April of 2008. WSJ said Sprint might sell its WiMax business, or may partner with another company — and one name dropped was the investor-rich Clearwire. (Another possibility is Time Warner.)
Is WiMax just too expensive? “For Sprint, its key issue is its overall financial situation,” says Paolini. The company’s merger with Nextel wasn’t too smooth, and its cellular service has faced a lot of churn. She thinks that in the long term, if Sprint wants to do WiMax right and make sure signals reach indoors for use, it’ll cost the company a lot more than $3 billion.
“In the U.S., the number of laptop users using even EV-DO is not that high,” she says, referring to the 3G technology deployed in several cities not only by Sprint but also by Verizon Wireless. She thinks, despite a lack of numbers from the two carriers, the number of users is probably around 2 million. “To justify a country-wide network for that few is a difficult proposition.”
Paolini thinks Clearwire, comparatively, is doing well with its proprietary pre-WiMax. Instead of worrying about having a nationwide, roamable network, Clearwire moves from market to market, installs what it needs to compete with the cable and DSL operators, and simply tries to provide something the others can’t. “It’s a tough challenge, but there is unhappiness with the incumbents, and they [Clearwire] can probably exploit that to their benefit,” she says. As long as each market gives them a share of the broadband pie, Paolini suggests, they can stay ahead — and new distribution deal with satellite TV providers DirecTV and EchoStar may give it some extra push with residences as well.
She’s also a fan of the business model for Towerstream, which focuses on a niche of businesses with its own fixed-only, pre-WiMax equipment. “You won’t see Towerstream capture 20 or 30% of all T1 connections anywhere, but it works,” says Paolini. What’s more, she points out, the company was profitable years ago, long before its latest move: it merged last year with a calendar company out of Canada called University Girls Calendar Ltd! (complete with exclamation point), and used its status on the NASDAC OTC Bulletin Board to go public. Its stock fell after opening — but not as much as Clearwire’s did after its own IPO; GigaOm calls Clearwire stock a “prime speculative play” going on a “bumpy ride – a long, bumpy ride.”
The Towerstream offering was for a modest $40 million. It needs the money to continue expanding. Yesterday, Towerstream announced plans to expand its service in the San Francisco Bay Area to include Oakland, California. “They don’t have to cover a whole city, just because it’s a big city,” says Paolini. “That gives them flexibility.” Towerstream’s current markets include New York City, Los Angeles, Chicago, Boston, Seattle, Miami, and Providence & Newport, Rhode Island.
So is WiMax/wireless broadband a guaranteed success if the providers can get the capital to build? Not necessarily. In fact, Paolini believes what the industry really needs to take off is a killer app. Not a phone – what we have today is fine – and not a bulky (or even svelte) laptop. “Consumer electronics, gaming devices, media players, etc. … that’s the market 3G infrastructure can’t serve well,” she says. “They need capacity.”
That’s true for both developed and developing countries: it’s got to be mobile. Paolini’s speculations on the perfect product to prod the industry sound a lot like the One Laptop per Per Child program and its competitors, but admits she’s not the product person. “A lot of vendors,” she chides, “how can I say… they’re not pursuing this as aggressively as they should.”
Even without a killer app for WiMax, the speculation will continue. Paolini likes the idea of Sprint and Clearwire teaming up in the future, as it would cut expenses for both – Clearwire wouldn’t have to market its offering as much, for instance, with the Sprint name behind it. The resulting lack of market overlap would also be nice, meaning national coverage might come all the sooner. “What we’ll see,” Paolini speculates, “is WiMax will be synonymous with Sprint and Clearwire together,” not just one or the other.