The good news: Federal agencies are making progress in implementing stronger information security regimes. The bad news: It hasn’t helped much.
A new report released Friday by the general Accountability Office (GAO)
states that “overall” agencies are improving their systems security, but
“pervasive weaknesses” still plague agencies and threaten the “integrity,
confidentiality and availability” of federal information systems.
In addition, the GAO report states the weaknesses place financial data at
risk of unauthorized modification or destruction, sensitive information at
risk of inappropriate disclosure and critical operations at risk of
disruption.
According to the GAO, the weaknesses exist because agencies have not yet
fully implemented the security measures mandated by the 2002 Federal
Information Security Management Act (FISMA).
“As a result, federal operations and assets are at increased risk of fraud,
misuse and destruction,” the GAO report states. “In addition, these
weaknesses place financial data at risk of unauthorized modification or
destruction, sensitive information at risk of inappropriate disclosure and
critical operations at risk of disruption.”
Of the 24 federal agencies it audited, the GAO study found five major areas
of weaknesses including access controls, software change controls,
segregation of duties, continuity of operations planning and agency-wide
security programs.
The Departments of Defense, Homeland Security, Commerce, Transportation,
Justice and Interior, the GAO states, have weaknesses in all five areas.
FISMA requires each agency to have policies and procedures that ensure
compliance with minimally acceptable system configuration requirements, as
determined by the agency.
In fiscal year 2004, for the first time, agencies reported on the degree to
which they had implemented security configurations for specific operating
systems and software applications.
“Our analysis of the 2004 agency FISMA reports found that 20 agencies
reported that they had implemented agency-wide policies containing detailed,
specific system configurations,” the report states. “However, these agencies
did not necessarily have minimally acceptable system configuration
requirements for operating systems and software applications that they were
running.”
Rep. Tom Davis (R-Va.), chairman of the House Government Reform Committee,
said in a statement, “The FISMA process is not a perfect one. I think it
provides the agencies with a strong management framework, but I recognize
that it is not a panacea; there may be a need for amendments to facilitate
implementation of the security concepts that drive FISMA.”
To shore up security at federal agencies, the GAO recommended that the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) implement improvements in reporting
guidance.
“Some FISMA requirements are not specifically being addressed through these
means, such as reporting on risk assessments, subordinate security plans,
security incident detection and response activities, and whether weaknesses
are mitigated,” the report states.
Davis, whose committee oversees federal agency operations, added, “The FISMA
process is still a young one; as it matures, the guidance will go through
growing pains and require further changes. Given the ever-evolving nature of
cyber threats, complacency is not an option.”
