[email protected] Network has repealed its highly-
criticized cable modem user agreement less than two-weeks after attempting
to introduce it.
@Home has produced a “plain English” clarification of the companies
subscriber agreement. The original 9,000-word document that was e-mailed to
about 40,000 @Home subscribers during the middle of February left
cable modem users uncertain about their rights to privacy. It was also unclear whether they could check work e-mail from their home connection.
Subscribers were furious when @Home stated in their acceptable use policy
that TCI might disclose to third parties personal information about their
subscribers in the ordinary course of business.
The customer-criticized clauses have become null and void, since the
reinstatement of the old acceptable use policy. A revised section of the
user agreement states that “TCI does not sell mailing lists of [email protected]
customers, nor does it release individual [email protected] customer information to
third parties,” without first obtaining the customer’s consent.
The reinstated version also includes modifications to reflect the fact that
customers can now purchase cable modems, rather than being forced to lease them from TCI.
Executives from both TCI and @Home said they never intented to
alarm users or infringe on their customer’s rights. The executives contend
that explaining complex technological services in unambiguous legalese is
Marcelo Halpern, a contract lawyer for Gordon & Glickson PC, said, “it used
to be that the way you would protect people from over-reaching contracts
was that the courts wouldn’t enforce them.”
seeing now in some of these cases is that the business moves so fast and
the information circulates so quickly around and through the Internet that
companies are afraid of having to weather a public relations storm. The
competition is just too quick to step in and fill the void,” Halpern said.
“Losing just a few customers on low-margin Internet products is a big risk
and I think what you’ll see is a lot of companies shying away from the
traditional broad-reaching contracts.”
When the TCI/@Home user agreement was first released, Jonathan Rosenburg,
@Home’s senior director of marketing, said the company had experienced a
“degradation of service due in part to our lack of enforcing these
policies. We are now being aggressive about enforcing these policies.”
However, in an Monday’s e-mail clarification to [email protected] users, customers were told the mission of the revised user agreement was to reflect
the fact that customers can now or soon may be able to purchase cable
modems. TCI also said the agreement was aimed at enhancing customer privacy.
@Home cable modem user Scott Greczkowski said his cable modem access
doesn’t have anything to do with service degradation in Connecticut. In a
lengthy conference call with [email protected] executives last week, Greczkowski was
informed that his service access speeds would not improve until a 5-Gig
circuit is added to the network sometime early in April.
Greczkowski is a member of the Connecticut @Home Users Group that staged a
protest concerning their service as a TCI/@Home enrollment promotion this
[email protected] company executives said they remain committed to protecting
the privacy rights of our customers and to enforcing policies that uphold