Court Ties Broadcom’s Qualcomm Hands

UPDATED: In the latest chapter of a long-running courtroom battle between rival 3G
chipmakers, a San Diego federal judge handed down a preliminary injunction
ruling Broadcom cannot use or disseminate confidential Qualcomm WCDMA trade secrets, according to San Diego-based Qualcomm .

The prohibition remains in effect until at least the
completion of a trial expected to wrap up in October 2007.

“Qualcomm is pleased with the injunction against Broadcom prohibiting any
use of our confidential information, as well as the prohibition against
future attempts to obtain such information,” William Sailer, Qualcomm’s
senior vice president and legal counsel, said in a statement.

The court order followed what Qualcomm said was the discovery that Broadcom
engaged in prior to unveiling its own WCDMA products “in a successful
multi-year effort to improperly acquire thousands of pages of Qualcomm
confidential business and technical information” related to the San
Diego-based company’s own WCDMA product development.

Broadcom had an entirely different view.

“Today’s press release from Qualcomm is misleading in several fundamental
respects,” Bill Blanning, a Broadcom spokesperson told
internetnews.com.

Broadcom called the preliminary injunction “far
narrower in scope” than the injunction Qualcomm had requested Oct. 2 before
San Diego federal judge Rudi Brewster. At that hearing, Broadcom said it
volunteered to a preliminary injunction quarantining a “limited set of
Qualcomm documents” until the case reaches trial.

Blanning said the
documents Broadcom agreed to quarantine were “a small fraction of those
originally identified by Qualcomm.”

The federal court ruling forbids Broadcom from using the information gained in
the “marketing, sales or development” of current or future products,
according to a Qualcomm statement.

“Broadcom has not misused any Qualcomm trade secrets, so the quarantine
until trial will have no effect on our business,” Blanding said.

The federal court ruling forbids Broadcom from using the information gained in
the “marketing, sales or development” of current or future products,
according to a Qualcomm statement.

The preliminary injunction comes one month after another courtroom loss for
Broadcom. In September, a New Jersey federal court dismissed a 2005
antitrust lawsuit Broadcom filed against Qualcomm.

The issue: what Broadcom
sees as unfair licensing by Qualcomm amounting to attempted monopolization
of 3G chipsets.

New Jersey judge Mary Cooper rejected the Irvine, Calif.
Broadcom’s arguments, saying they did not “support an inference that
competition in the UMTS chipset market, is or will be injured by Qualcomm’s
licensing practices.”

Since 2005, Qualcomm and Broadcom have engaged in a war-of-words over the
lucrative 3G market. Broadcom must negotiate with Qualcomm for licensing
patented Wideband Code Division Multiple Access (WCDMA) technology.

That original lawsuit
held Qualcomm reneged on representations it would license the WCDMA patents,
now part of the UMTS 3G standard, in a fair, reasonable and
non-discriminatory (FRAND) manner.

Broadcom charged that its inability to license
the technology essentially prevented its competing WCDMA products from
reaching market.

Soon after that first patent lawsuit, Qualcomm responded with its own court action, filing a lawsuit alleging Broadcom infringed on
six patents relating to chips used in GSM and Wi-Fi devices.

News Around the Web