A Virginia court this past week threw out a motion for a jury trial on
Proving patent infringement is no sure bet, as Business Objects discovered
MicroStrategy’s allegations that Business Objects
tortiously interfered with employment agreements between MicroStrategy
and its former employees in a legal duel between two
business intelligence software leaders.
Business intelligence software is a highly lucrative niche of software
applications that all types of companies purchase to help gauge data about
customers, employees and products to improve their business performance. IDC
expects the market for such software to top $4.5 billion by 2007.
The development is a coup of sorts for France-based Business Objects, who is
in the middle of digesting an $820 million purchase
of Crystal Decisions to boost its reporting capabilities. However, McLean,
Va.-based MicroStrategy has also sued Business Objects for misappropriation
of trade secrets and patent infringement.
MicroStrategy expects a ruling by the U.S. District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia on the merit of the trade secrets claim, for which it
is seeking fiscal compensation, soon. However, the court has already ruled
that MicroStrategy is not entitled to monetary damages for its
misappropriation of trade secrets claim.
Meanwhile, MicroStrategy said its claim against Business Objects for
infringement of a patent for automatic output of service-related OLAP
6,260,050) is expected to go to jury trial in April 2004.
when it unsuccessfully sued MicroStrategy in a Californian court to the tune
of $100 million for allegedly infringing on a patent for relational database
access systems that use “semantically dynamic objects” (U.S. Patent No.
5,555,403).
The court said that Business Objects’ claims could not be supported.
Business Objects filed a motion with the trial court to vacate the summary
judgment ruling but was denied. The company has filed anotice of appeal.