SHARE
Facebook X Pinterest WhatsApp

Internet 2001: For International Portals, Grass is Just As Red

Written By
thumbnail
Chris Nerney
Chris Nerney
Jan 9, 2001

Remember all that investor excitement about those wide-open international mega-markets in China and Latin America? Back in 1999, aspiring portal companies and their backers were salivating at the prospect of capturing the online allegiance of millions of new Web surfers and shoppers in untapped and underserved markets.

Things haven’t quite worked out as expected for the numerous international portals that went public in the past two years. In fact, rather than flexing their muscles in Asia and elsewhere, virtually every international portal player faces survival questions. That’s because, like in the U.S., advertising revenues are down, and Internet penetration is much slower than expected.

Indeed, Merrill Lynch on Tuesday issued a gloomy forecast for the Chinese advertising market, slashing its forecast for 2001 to $80 million from $120 million.

In China, consolidation is coming fast. One Chinese portal, Netease.com, last week hired Goldman Sachs to find a buyer or merger deal. And in December, Chinese news media reported that Chinadotcom was seeking a multiple merger with Netease.com, Sohu.com and Sina.com. The companies denied the report, but that’s the kind of climate that exists.

Sohu.com, meanwhile, announced in December that it would lay off 20% of its workforce after purchasing ChinaRen.com in a $30 million stock deal.

All of the China portals are losing money, too. Here are numbers from Q3:

Ticker           Company     Revenue   Net Loss  Per Share

   Chinadotcom  $36.5M    $20.5M    $(0.21)
    Netease.com    2.6M      5.0M     (0.01)
    SINA.com       7.2M     10.2M     (0.26)
    Sohu.com       1.6M      4.0M     (0.14)

What strikes me are the low revenue totals: less than $50 million between the four companies. Not exactly reflective of the huge potential of the China market.
And when you factor in Merrill Lynch’s new advertising revenue forecast – which I suspect might even be slightly optimistic – and it’s hard to see how any of these companies will be able to grow in the coming year.

How about the pure Latin American portals? Even worse on a per-share loss basis, I’m afraid. Here are Q3 numbers for StarMedia Network, quepasa.com, El Sitio and AOL Latin America:

Ticker           Company     Revenue   Net Loss  Per Share

    StarMedia    $17.1M    $36.0M    $(0.54)
    quepasa.com    1.0M      7.9M     (0.45)
    El Sitio      11.0M     21.0M     (0.47)
    AOL L.A.       4.6M    100.1M     (2.93)

For investors, the bottom line is that these major international markets are still in their nascent stages, relative to the U.S., and not likely to support profitable portals in the near future.

Recommended for you...

U.S. Needs to Protect Tech Leadership: Qualcomm
Rob Enderle
Apr 8, 2022
HP’s ExtendXR Service Gets an Early Lead on a Looming Metaverse Problem
Rob Enderle
Mar 5, 2022
Cisco’s Purpose Is to Improve the World. Imagine if Others Followed.
Rob Enderle
Dec 17, 2021
HP Builds an Advanced Cloud Workstation for the Metaverse
Rob Enderle
Nov 13, 2021
Internet News Logo

InternetNews is a source of industry news and intelligence for IT professionals from all branches of the technology world. InternetNews focuses on helping professionals grow their knowledge base and authority in their field with the top news and trends in Software, IT Management, Networking & Communications, and Small Business.

Property of TechnologyAdvice. © 2025 TechnologyAdvice. All Rights Reserved

Advertiser Disclosure: Some of the products that appear on this site are from companies from which TechnologyAdvice receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where products appear on this site including, for example, the order in which they appear. TechnologyAdvice does not include all companies or all types of products available in the marketplace.