Supreme Court Ends Battle

Writing the final chapter of the six-year legal battle over the
domain name, The U.S. Supreme Court Thursday rejected the appeal of Stephen
Michael Cohen, the man found to have illegally hijacked the domain.

“The Supreme Court’s denial of Mr. Cohen’s writ petition is significant
because it puts the final nail in the coffin,” said Pamela Ureta, an
attorney for Gary Kremen, founder of “Cohen has tried
unsuccessfully both in the Ninth Circuit and, most recently in the Supreme
Court, to overturn the $65 million judgment against him. There is nowhere
else for him to try to appeal; the judgment is final.”

Kremen registered in 1994 through Network Solutions, now a
subsidiary of VeriSign . At the time, Kremen was doing
business as Online Classifieds, Inc.

After a period of a year while sat dormant, Cohen, who previously
served time in federal prison for bankruptcy fraud and impersonating an
attorney, decided to commandeer the potentially lucrative domain name and
forged a letter written on Online Classified letterhead to Network
Solutions requesting transference of ownership.

For a fee of $1,000, Networks Solutions processed the domain name
conversion and officially became Cohen’s property.

According to reports, Cohen then launched an Internet pornography business
based on the domain name, but by the time Kremen was aware of the
theft, Network Solutions refused to change the registration back without a
court order.

Kremen went to legal battle against Cohen and his numerous business
entities, with an added appeal that Network Solutions should be responsible
for negligence due to the fact that the registrar did not even attempt to
verify the forged letter that served as the basis for the domain name

In September 2002, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit approved a $65
award in Kremen v. Cohen, setting the wheels in motion for
Kremen to regain control of and collect a substantial judgment from
Cohen, including $25 million in punitive damages.

But by that time Cohen had skipped off to Tijuana, Mexico and would not
comply with the judgment’s orders.

During the same ruling, the claim against Network Solutions was rejected
based on the fact that a private company which is the sole domain name
registry for domain names is immune from civil suit in cases where it
negligently handled a domain name.

Cohen then appealed to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. Finally, he appealed to the U.S.
Supreme Court with a petition for Writ of Certiorari, which the court

“The U.S. Supreme Court has finally put an end to Cohen’s battle over the domain name in a precedent-setting case that requires domain name
registrars to be held accountable for their mismanagement of crucial public
resources such as the Internet,” said Robin Gross, executive director of
international civil liberties organization IP Justice.

Charles Carreon, one of Kremen’s lead attorneys, added, “ provided
the best test case imaginable, and Mr. Cohen turned it into a test of
endurance. Although Gary takes the top prize, all domain name owners will
benefit from the law this case has established. I trust that eventually,
VeriSign will accept responsibility for its initial blunder and pay Gary
the damages that are due.”

Kremen has sued VeriSign for unilaterally taking away the domain
name, and for inadequately safeguarding his property. The verdict in
Kremen’s suit against VeriSign is still outstanding.

Get the Free Newsletter!

Subscribe to our newsletter.

Subscribe to Daily Tech Insider for top news, trends & analysis

News Around the Web