SHARE
Facebook X Pinterest WhatsApp

Supreme Court Refuses to Grant Line-Sharing Stay

Written By
thumbnail
Roy Mark
Roy Mark
Jun 15, 2004

The U.S. Supreme Court refused Monday to grant a temporary stay of a lower court decision striking down rules forcing incumbent telephone companies to provide discounted access to their competitors.

Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist’s decision not to grant the stay request by AT&T and other long distance providers, along with a number of competitive local exchange carriers and public utility commissions, means that after midnight Tuesday, the carriers must negotiate at market rates for access to the Baby Bell lines.


“This is not surprising given the Bush Administration decision to abandon the litigation. It confirms that the administration has set the industry on a path to higher prices, less competition, fewer jobs and depressed investment,” AT&T said a statement.


Last week, both the Bush administration and the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) decided not to appeal a March decision by the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals rejecting the FCC’s latest line-sharing plan, setting into motion the temporary stay request by AT&T on Thursday afternoon.


The rejection of the stay request does not preclude a formal appeal to the Supreme Court by AT&T and the other long distance carriers.


The long distance carriers and consumer advocates claim the D.C. Court’s decision will inevitably result in higher consumer telephone prices. Supporters of the court ruling contend subsidized long distance and local telephone rates are no longer necessary in a telecom industry increasingly characterized by competition among wireline, wireless, cable and satellite communications providers.


In August of last year, the FCC issued rules allowing the Bells to close off their high-speed lines to competitors while continuing to require the incumbent telecoms to share their voice copper lines with competitors at steeply discounted prices. The U.S. Telecom Association (USTA) and three Baby Bells appealed the rules.


In March the D.C. Court tossed out the discount line pricing provisions but upheld all other parts of the FCC ruling. While the Department of Justice and FCC considered an appeal of the decision, FCC Chairman Michael Powell urged the incumbents and the long distance carriers to negotiate on their own to reach agreement on line rates.


While MCI cut a deal with Qwest Communications, the other long distance carriers have been unable to strike a compromise with the incumbents.


After the Department of Justice decided not to appeal the D.C. Court decision, FCC Chairman Michael Powell said his agency would immediately begin drafting new line-sharing rules and predicted the FCC would have new regulations in place by the end of the year.

Recommended for you...

U.S. Needs to Protect Tech Leadership: Qualcomm
Rob Enderle
Apr 8, 2022
HP’s ExtendXR Service Gets an Early Lead on a Looming Metaverse Problem
Rob Enderle
Mar 5, 2022
Cisco’s Purpose Is to Improve the World. Imagine if Others Followed.
Rob Enderle
Dec 17, 2021
HP Builds an Advanced Cloud Workstation for the Metaverse
Rob Enderle
Nov 13, 2021
Internet News Logo

InternetNews is a source of industry news and intelligence for IT professionals from all branches of the technology world. InternetNews focuses on helping professionals grow their knowledge base and authority in their field with the top news and trends in Software, IT Management, Networking & Communications, and Small Business.

Property of TechnologyAdvice. © 2025 TechnologyAdvice. All Rights Reserved

Advertiser Disclosure: Some of the products that appear on this site are from companies from which TechnologyAdvice receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where products appear on this site including, for example, the order in which they appear. TechnologyAdvice does not include all companies or all types of products available in the marketplace.