SHARE
Facebook X Pinterest WhatsApp

Xerox Claim Vs. Palm Affirmed, Questioned

Written By
thumbnail
Mark Berniker
Mark Berniker
Feb 21, 2003

A federal court of appeals has ruled that Palm
infringed upon a handwriting-recognition patent developed by Xerox,
but a lower court must now determine the validity of the
patent.

The ruling affirmed a lower court ruling and rejected Palm’s appeal of a
decision delivered in December 2001. The legal row is over Xerox’s
Unistrokes patent, which was developed at Xerox PARC, and enables users to
input letters and numbers into personal data units with basic, one stroke
handwriting movements.

The Court of Appeals did find that the lower court failed to provide
adequate information and analysis of several aspects of the patent’s
validity. Xerox, for its part, wants the court to impose a legal injunction
barring Palm from selling portable computing devices that infringe on
Xerox’s patent.

In 2002, the District Court ordered Palm to post a bond of $50 million to
make sure Xerox would be able to collect potential damages. The case started
in April 1997, when Xerox sued then-U.S. Robotics, which was subsequently
acquired by 3Com, and spun off into Palm. Xerox said that Palm’s
Graffiti technology used in Palm, Handspring and other portable computing
devices infringed on its patent.

Palm, for its part in the ongoing legal fight, says it is building new
handwriting recognition technology into future software and devices.

But the court in its decision said: “We find no error in the district
court’s infringement analysis, and we affirm that aspect of the district
court’s decision.”

The Xerox-Palm case now returns a portion of the case to Judge Michael
Telesca, U.S. District Court for the Western District of New York in
Rochester for further study of the uniqueness of the patent, giving Palm the
opportunity to make another legal challenge to Xerox’s contention.

The decision is being seen as a partial reprieve for Palm, as it has another
chance to make its case. If Palm is not able to convince Judge Telesca, then
the company would have to stop selling devices that utilize the
handwriting-recognition software.

Recommended for you...

U.S. Needs to Protect Tech Leadership: Qualcomm
Rob Enderle
Apr 8, 2022
HP’s ExtendXR Service Gets an Early Lead on a Looming Metaverse Problem
Rob Enderle
Mar 5, 2022
Cisco’s Purpose Is to Improve the World. Imagine if Others Followed.
Rob Enderle
Dec 17, 2021
HP Builds an Advanced Cloud Workstation for the Metaverse
Rob Enderle
Nov 13, 2021
Internet News Logo

InternetNews is a source of industry news and intelligence for IT professionals from all branches of the technology world. InternetNews focuses on helping professionals grow their knowledge base and authority in their field with the top news and trends in Software, IT Management, Networking & Communications, and Small Business.

Property of TechnologyAdvice. © 2025 TechnologyAdvice. All Rights Reserved

Advertiser Disclosure: Some of the products that appear on this site are from companies from which TechnologyAdvice receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where products appear on this site including, for example, the order in which they appear. TechnologyAdvice does not include all companies or all types of products available in the marketplace.