In a preemptive strike against congressional critics of its China conduct,
Yahoo said today the private sector cannot “effectively influence” foreign
government censorship policies and human rights violations.
That problem, Yahoo contends, is best solved by “government-to-government
Yahoo, along with Google, Microsoft and Cisco, are under fire for their
open cooperation with the Chinese government’s efforts to block certain
search engine results and to ferret out Internet dissidents critical of
Beijing’s repressive regime.
The four iconic Internet firms are expected to take hostile fire
from a House International Relations subcommittee hearing on China’s Web
policies Wednesday morning.
While never mentioning China by name, Yahoo issued a two-page statement
Monday admitting to the “challenging and complex” issues of doing business
in a global marketplace.
“We are deeply concerned by efforts of governments to restrict and control
open access to information and communication,” Yahoo stated. “We also firmly
believe the continued presence and engagement of companies like Yahoo is a
powerful force in promoting openness and reform.”
Lawmakers expect to hit Yahoo in particular with hard questions about its
role in turning over users’ names to Beijing. Last week, Reporters Without
Borders blasted Yahoo, claiming the company gave up the name of cyber
dissident Li Zhi, who was imprisoned for eight years in 2003.
Yahoo has also been accused of helping Beijing trace the e-mail of Chinese
journalist Shi Tao, who was sending messages to human rights organizations.
Tao is now serving a 10-year prison sentence.
At China’s request, Microsoft last month shut down the blog of online
journalist Zhao Jing. Microsoft’s China portal also blocks terms such as
“freedom” and “democracy” in blogs.
Google will be expected to explain its decision to agree to censor search
terms in return for obtaining a license to operate a local version of Google
“Several of the top U.S. Internet companies have aided and complied with the
Chinese government’s demand for censorship in order to enter the PRC market,
in essence becoming a megaphone for communist propaganda and a tool for
controlling public opinion,” the House subcommittee’s statement on
Wednesday’s hearing claims.
Yahoo and the other firms claim they are only following the laws of the
countries they operate in.
“We offer localized content in more than 20 countries in a dozen languages.
We recognize each country enacts its own laws in accordance with its own
local norms and mores, and we must comply with applicable laws,” Yahoo said.
“We also believe our presence significantly benefits a country’s citizens
through access to services and information.”