Ad Industry Vets Question Effectiveness of Dot-Com Super Bowl Spots

The thinkers behind some of the most memorable Super Bowl television spots
Monster.com‘s highly-acclaimed ad
on last year’s Super Bowl broadcast, and the “1984” commercial that
launched Apple‘s Macintosh — are
questioning the effectiveness of buying a spot on the big game this year.


Recalling the great success of last year’s Monster.com spot, Edward Boches,
the chief creative officer of Mullen
Advertising
, says, “one commercial on the Super Bowl somehow did
everything you would want.”


It drove traffic, built the brand, and, Boches laughs, even drove the stock
price up. “Clearly,” he said, “the success of Monster.com has been hard to
duplicate.”


Dot-com companies, says Boches, should be asking themselves, “am I really
going to be able to stand out in an environment in which we’re asking
consumers to remember ten brand names that they’ve never heard of.”


The success of dot-com advertising is predicated on four factors, according
to Boches. First, there should be latent brand awareness, which is easier
with a bricks-and-mortar retailer or a brand with a long history. In
addition, the value proposition should be unique, which is easier if the
company is a first mover in its space.

Thirdly, the company needs to
aggressively put its name out there. And finally, consumers need to
understand, on an emotional level, what the dot-com company can do for
them. Only the fourth, that emotional relevance, can be created by an ad
agency.


Speaking at a Silicon Alley Breakfast Club panel discussion about dot-com
advertising on prime time TV, Boches, along with Jay Chiat, the founder of
Chiat/Day, described a landscape that
has drastically changed since Monster.com’s ads debuted.


“A lot of what’s happening now with the Super Bowl is that it’s become more
of a media event than an entertainment event,” says Chiat, who is credited
with starting the mad advertising rush at the Super Bowl with the Orwellian
“1984” Macintosh ad. If the media likes the ad, says Chiat, then it’s been
successful.


Chiat questions conventional wisdom, which says that Super Bowl viewers are
watching the ads, as much as the football game. “Most people are there
because there’s a party going on,” says Chiat, “and they don’t even watch
the ball game, much less the advertising.”


Chiat dodged questions, though, about the decision by his own company, Screaming Media, to drop its own
plans for an ad in the Super Bowl. The company reportedly reconsidered when
it discovered that there would be a dozen or so dot-com advertisers on this
year’s game.


Dot-com advertisers are said to account for up to a third of the spots on
this year’s Super Bowl, with each paying $2 million or more for a 30-second
spot.

Get the Free Newsletter!

Subscribe to our newsletter.

Subscribe to Daily Tech Insider for top news, trends & analysis

News Around the Web