The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers ruffled feathers Friday morning by dismissing some domain suffix requests and questioning the effectiveness of some applicants with the release of its report
on potential new top-level domain names.
Among the suffixes dismissed were .xxx and .kids from ICM Registry Inc. and scores of applications from Name.Space, including .agency and .commerce.
Jason Hendeles, president and chairman of ICM Registry (which saw .xxx
and .kids rejected by ICANN), expressed concerned about the development.
“The main concern that we have right now is that there is a clear bias and
unwillingness by ICANN to address the most significant concern on the
Internet today which I think is the safeguarding of children against harmful
content,” Helendes.
“They’ve shown that they support the strengths of our application. They
basically say that the application itself meets the criteria but because
.xxx and .kids are controversial, they have concerns at this point. I don’t
know if that is a legitimate argument for the registry that we’re
proposing.”
Paul Garrin, founder & CEO Name.Space, which submitted applications for 117 domain suffixes, said he thinks the decision-making was confusing because of the vague implications of .biz and .web domain suffixes, which were accepted.
“ICANN is coming at this from a totally opposite point of view from the way it should be determined,” Garrin said. “They’re coming at this from a bureaucratic, legalistic, top-down, authoritative structure. What we’ve done is actually listen to people and what they want and how is it logically organized. By arbitrarily limiting it, they’re not solving the problem of artificial scarcity and they’re not solving the problem of differentiation. So, widgets.com and widgets.biz or widgets.web is just more confusing. It’s not enough of a distinction. If more domains that are more specific like .books or .cafe, it is much more
While those suffixes did not pass muster, ICANN agreed to pass along recommendations for three suitors
courting the .web suffix — Image Online Design Inc., which has used the
denomination for four years, the Network Solutions-spearheaded Afilias LLC,
and the smaller NeuStar Inc.
With more than 20,000 .web domain name holders, Image Online has
unquestionably the most at stake in ICANN’s voting process, which will kick
off Sunday at the organization’s annual meeting.
That company’s Chief
Technology Officer, Chris Ambler, told InternetNews.com Thursday that he was justifiably concerned that preliminary reports were not
too favorable for his firm’s plea to keep using .web.
ICANN’s report Friday indicated he and Image Online had reason to be
concerned: the organization passed Image Online’s request for .web
consideration by a whisker.
“Both the business/financial team and the technical team each independently
concluded after the threshold review that the application from Image Online
Design Inc. did not justify further evaluation,” ICANN stated.
“However, because of the large number of favorable comments in the ICANN
Public Comment Forum, the ICANN staff requested that the evaluation team
examine Image Online Design’s application more closely in the evaluation
process.”
The tone of the remainder of ICANN’s statement about Image Online was not
too encouraging, going so far as to question the group’s competency in
running .web as a registry:
“Image Online Design identified only three employees who would form the core
competency team of the expanded company. Only one of the “core” employees
has technical experience,” ICANN stated. “The principal experience of the
other two, the CEO and the COO, is in the operation of auto dealerships;
their experience in technical management and operat
ions comes from their
experience at Image Online Design’s currently modest registry operation.”
A disappointed Ambler presided over a press conference Friday. Though he
admitted he was satisfied that the board agreed to give Image Online’s
request further consideration, he was displeased by the criticisms, which he
said were invalid, and could lead to an unfavorable decision by ICANN.
ICANN Chief Policy Officer Andrew McLaughlin issued this statement to InternetNews.com Friday afternoon:
“We think the report is fair, though everyone is entitled to scrutinize it and post any errors on the comment forum,” McLuahlin wrote. “We just tried to call it like we
saw it. The report is an evaluation of proposals, not a recommendation
about which TLD the Board should select. That’s up to the Board.”
Also among the hotly-contested mix is a proposal for the .biz, applied for
by iDomains Inc., JVTeam LLC and KDD Internet Solutions CO.
As predicted, some of the 191 submitted domain names from the 44 registries
did not make the final cut for further review next week.
Brian McWilliams, host of InternetNews Radio, contributed to this story.
