SHARE
Facebook X Pinterest WhatsApp

E-Buy Bid a Hoax

Written By
thumbnail
Kelly Black
Kelly Black
May 31, 2000

Yesterday there was a groovy tidbit on cyber-newsstands that caught my eye
about a Brit entrepreneur who turned down the handsome sum of 7 million
buckaroos for his domain name, e-buy.com. Journalists couldn’t seem to
figure out how the bloke could walk away from such a king’s ransom.


Simple. The story was nothing but a hoax. Anyone who bought it should check
their beer goggles at the door. First off, most gold-plated domain offers
that mysteriously wind their way around the Web are phony-baloney seven
days a week and twice on Sunday. It’s a rare find indeed when an offer can
simply be substantiated, let alone backed up with cash.


The sad fact is that this kind of hysteria only serves to fan the flames of
get-rich-quick pipe dreams. I can’t tell you how many times I’ve had not-so
Net savvy acquaintances stumble over themselves to tell me about their
newest brilliant idea to mint a million.


I end up shaking my head at seeing an Internic bill with a few thousand
dollars flushed down the commode. This story always ends the same way, but
they never listen to me.


So back to this pesky e-buy business. Peter Littke wants awestruck Web
enthusiasts to buy the ridiculous tale of turning his back on the
greenbacks because he has this nagging dream of opening his very own
cyber-department store this summer. Half the story is true, but the rest is
hogwash thrown in for effect to net some free publicity for his novel idea
of selling books, CDs and the like over the World Wide Web.


Why? Well first off, nobody in their right mind would pay that sum for
ebuy.com, let alone e-dash-buy-dot-com. When business.com legitimately went for a
comparable amount, B2B was hotter than a grease fire. In this case, we’re
talking about a plain vanilla B2C domain, and not a very good one at that.


Look no further than fellow UK-based Boo.com’s highly publicized implosion. The
entire company’s assets fetched a paltry $375,000. And that’s probably the
biggest understatement this side of the new millennium. I’m sure there’s a
VC associate abroad who’s getting talked down from a ledge as we speak. The
Boo fiasco was the last nail in the coffin for most wide-eyed lofty B2C
plans that might entail a $7 million domain name grab.


Littke cooed, “Of course it was tempting. It’s enough money to live on for
the rest of your life. But you have to ask ‘Do I believe in my business?’ I
know we will get much more value from the name in the long term.” As
expected, Littke was milking his fifteen minutes, soliciting handouts for
venture backing.


There won’t be any takers here, just gullible media willing to spread a
little manure. But, can’t blame the guy for trying.


Any questions or comments, love letters or hate mail? As always, feel free
to forward them to kblack@internet.com.

Recommended for you...

U.S. Needs to Protect Tech Leadership: Qualcomm
Rob Enderle
Apr 8, 2022
HP’s ExtendXR Service Gets an Early Lead on a Looming Metaverse Problem
Rob Enderle
Mar 5, 2022
Cisco’s Purpose Is to Improve the World. Imagine if Others Followed.
Rob Enderle
Dec 17, 2021
HP Builds an Advanced Cloud Workstation for the Metaverse
Rob Enderle
Nov 13, 2021
Internet News Logo

InternetNews is a source of industry news and intelligence for IT professionals from all branches of the technology world. InternetNews focuses on helping professionals grow their knowledge base and authority in their field with the top news and trends in Software, IT Management, Networking & Communications, and Small Business.

Property of TechnologyAdvice. © 2025 TechnologyAdvice. All Rights Reserved

Advertiser Disclosure: Some of the products that appear on this site are from companies from which TechnologyAdvice receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where products appear on this site including, for example, the order in which they appear. TechnologyAdvice does not include all companies or all types of products available in the marketplace.