Sprint is gearing up for deploying the next generation IPv6
Whether or not the government agencies will actually be running IPv6 by June
of 2008 is an issue that is still not yet clear. All told, it could amount to
billions of dollars of revenue for vendors in 2008 and beyond.
Tony D’Agata, vice president of federal sales for Sprint explained to
InternetNews.com that Sprint has been working with IPv6 from a
development point of view for many years. That said, due to the looming
federal mandate Sprint is ramping up some specific IPv6 offerings that are
expected to be ready in the second quarter of 2008.
“We are IPv6 enabling our network and actively pursing putting IPv6 on our
peerless IP network,” D’Agata said. “We also have plans to implement IPv6 on
Sprint’s Peerless IP (PIP) network is Sprint’s own Internet platform that is
both logically and physically separate from the public Internet. According
to D’Agata it is Sprint’s PIP network that provides competitive
differentiation against others that are seeking to provide IPv6 services to
“It’s the only physically separated IP platform out there without peering
points or gateways,” D’Agata claimed. “Having that IPv6 enabled allows
agencies to procure peerless IP which has been popular in helping to reduce
incidents of denial of service.”
In terms of helping government and commercial enterprise customers with
migration issues from IPv4 to IPv6, the plan is for Sprint to run a dual
stack using both versions of IP.
“For those government agencies that need to be IPv6 enabled, it’s just a
matter of moving their ports over to the IPv6 environment,” D’Agata said.
“Those that don’t can stay with IPv4.”
What’s driving the demand for IPv6 at this point is a US Government Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) mandate for IPv6 by June of 2008. The plan
for Sprint is to be there for its government customers to help them be
compliant with the mandate. There is however still a question of how far
the IPv6 mandate actually extends and what it specifically entails.
“The OMB mandate is to be IPv6 enabled,” D’Agata argued. “It is not yet
clear whether or not agencies will actually chose to activate services on
IPv6. They have so many other initiatives on their plate and this is just
one of them. Time will tell if they will have active IPv6 networks and will
be actually transporting traffic over their networks.”
The basic reason why there is a need for IPv6 in the first place is the
simple fact that the IPv4 address space is near exhaustion. IPv6 offers
significantly more address space, which is something that government wants.
D’Agata noted that among the agencies that are likely to deploy IPv6 is the
Department of Defense (DoD), which wants to create IP addresses on major
pieces of equipment in the battle space.
To date there have been a number of different reasons why IPv6 has not been
implemented in the government.
“There have been some contractual delays that precluded the implementation
and not all agencies have yet migrated to an IP environment,” D’Agata said.
“Quite a few are in legacy technologies like ATM or Frame Relay so they have
to go to go through a process of re-architecting their network environment.”
The other reason for the slow adoption of IPv6 is that for many, there
simply hasn’t been a real imperative to move.
“There is no critical application yet that agencies are saying ‘gee, I need
IPv6 for this’,” D’Agata commented. “When you’re only implementing it to meet
a government mandate you go at a different pace then if you actually need if
for an application.”